User Story: AI-Powered Automated Welding Quality Inspection
ID: TMBS-WELD-01 Title: Real-time Welding Defect Identification Priority: High
User Story Statement:
As a Quality Control Engineer at TMBS, I want the AI inspection system to automatically analyze live video feeds from the welding stations, So that I can identify and categorize weld defects instantly and ensure only high-quality modules proceed to the next assembly stage.
Acceptance Criteria (AC):
AC 1: The system must accurately classify the welding output into the following categories:
burn_through,crack,porosity,undercut,overlap, orgood_weld.AC 2: The system must provide real-time inference during the welding process, triggering an alert if a defect is detected.
AC 3: If a defect (0 through 4) is identified, the system must log the specific defect type and timestamp to the central tracking database.
AC 4: The inspection UI must clearly highlight the detected defect on the video feed to assist the operator in manual verification.
AC 5: The system must distinguish a
good_weldfrom the identified defect classes with a minimum defined confidence threshold (e.g., >90%).
User Stories: Our Roadmap
1. The Quality Control (QC) Engineer
"As a QC Engineer at TMBS, I want the AI inspection system to automatically analyze live video feeds from the welding stations so that I can identify and categorize weld defects instantly and ensure only high-quality modules proceed to the next assembly stage."
The Vision: AI-Powered "Quality 4.0"
We are developing a dedicated inspection service that leverages high-speed industrial vision to classify weld quality using a defined taxonomy:
{0: "burn_through", 1: "crack", 2: "porosity", 3: "undercut", 4: "overlap", 5: "good_weld"}.
To align with our Agile development process, we have broken down this transformation into clear user-focused objectives.
Comments
Post a Comment